INGV Sezione di Pisa

26.9k citations
909 papers ·

Impact in

  • Geology top 2%
    • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Geophysics top 5%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
    • earthquake and tectonic studies

Papers in

    • Geological and Geophysical Studies 267
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis 267
    • earthquake and tectonic studies 104
    • Seismic Waves and Analysis 56

INGV Sezione di Pisa

866 papers receiving 26.8k citations

Peers

INGV Sezione di Pisa
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Geology 7.5k
  • Geophysics 12.2k
  • Atmospheric Science 4.3k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 2k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 1.5k
Replace INGV Sezione di Bologna with:
INGV Sezione di Bologna
Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes Italy
Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche-sur-Mer France
INGV Sezione di Roma 1 Italy
Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand France
INGV Sezione di Palermo
Laboratoire de Sciences de la Terre France
Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology Switzerland
Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities Germany
Regione Emilia-Romagna
INGV Sezione di Pisa relative to INGV Sezione di Bologna INGV Sezione di Bologna's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
INGV Sezione di Bologna · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at INGV Sezione di Pisa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at INGV Sezione di Pisa. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at INGV Sezione di Pisa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites INGV Sezione di Pisa more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at INGV Sezione di Pisa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with INGV Sezione di Pisa at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with INGV Sezione di Pisa at the time of their publication.

About INGV Sezione di Pisa

In recent decades, authors affiliated with INGV Sezione di Pisa have published 909 papers, which have received a total of 26.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 280 papers in Geology, 421 papers in Geophysics, 154 papers in Atmospheric Science, 88 papers in Earth-Surface Processes and 51 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (267 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (267 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (104 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (89 papers), Landslides and related hazards (80 papers), Geological formations and processes (77 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (74 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geology (7.5k citations), Geophysics (12.2k citations), Atmospheric Science (4.3k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (2k citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (1.5k citations). Authors at INGV Sezione di Pisa collaborate with scholars in Italy, United Kingdom and France and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Bulletin of Volcanology, Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth and Scientific Reports. Some of INGV Sezione di Pisa's most productive authors include ANTONELLA BERTAGNINI, Paolo Papale, Augusto Neri, Francesco Mazzarini, Massimiliano Favalli, Massimo Pompilio, Mauro Rosi, Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, M. T. Pareschi and Ilaria Isola.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact