National Institute for Astrophysics
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 0.5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astro and Planetary Science
Papers in
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 2.3k
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 1.9k
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 1.7k
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 1.5k
- Astro and Planetary Science 1.4k
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 1.3k
- Instrumentation 1.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 1.3k
National Institute for Astrophysics
7.5k papers receiving 179.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
- Instrumentation 34.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 158.8k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 37.4k
- Geophysics 6.3k
- Atmospheric Science 8.5k
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute for Astrophysics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute for Astrophysics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute for Astrophysics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute for Astrophysics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute for Astrophysics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute for Astrophysics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute for Astrophysics at the time of their publication.
About National Institute for Astrophysics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute for Astrophysics have published 8.1k papers, which have received a total of 181.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6.7k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.3k papers in Instrumentation, 1.7k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 245 papers in Radiation and 329 papers in Geophysics on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2.3k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (1.9k papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (1.7k papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1.5k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (1.4k papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (1.3k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1.3k papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1.2k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (34.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (158.8k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (37.4k citations), Geophysics (6.3k citations) and Atmospheric Science (8.5k citations). Authors at National Institute for Astrophysics collaborate with scholars in Italy, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, Icarus and The Astrophysical Journal Letters. Some of National Institute for Astrophysics's most productive authors include F. D’Antona, R. Bruno, V. Carbone, R. Maiolino, G. Ghisellini, A. Chieffi, R. Gratton, Marco Limongi, S. Cassisi and E. Carretta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.