Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie
Impact in
- Condensed Matter Physics top 1%
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
-
- Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Papers in
-
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 457
- GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials 257
- Rare-earth and actinide compounds 256
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics 252
- Top scholars
- Jean CadetThierry DoukiB. DiényJean‐Luc RavanatLiang LiJacques PécautPeter ReißMairbek Chshiev
- Journals
- Physical Review B (350 papers)Applied Physics Letters (228 papers)Physical Review Letters (175 papers)Physical review. B. (142 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (117 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie
3.7k papers receiving 135.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Condensed Matter Physics 28.2k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 29.4k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 44.8k
- Materials Chemistry 49.7k
- Structural Biology 1.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie at the time of their publication.
About Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 137.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 887 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 1.3k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 57 papers in Structural Biology and 1.1k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (457 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (414 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (368 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (285 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (257 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (256 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (252 papers) and Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (215 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (28.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (29.4k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (44.8k citations), Materials Chemistry (49.7k citations) and Structural Biology (1.5k citations). Authors at Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie collaborate with scholars in France, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review B, Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B. and Journal of Applied Physics. Some of Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie's most productive authors include Jean Cadet, Thierry Douki, B. Diény, Jean‐Luc Ravanat, Liang Li, Jacques Pécaut, Peter Reiß, Mairbek Chshiev, Marinella Mazzanti and S. Auffret.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.