Institute for Molecular Science
Impact in
- Inorganic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
-
- Magnetism in coordination complexes
- Organic and Molecular Conductors Research
Papers in
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 1.8k
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies 1.3k
-
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies 709
- Top scholars
- Donglin JiangYuko OkamotoFumio HirataEizi HirotaShigeru NagaseKoji KimataYuji SugitaTatsuya Tsukuda
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (843 papers)Chemical Physics Letters (609 papers)Chemistry Letters (363 papers)Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan (345 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (278 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Institute for Molecular Science
11.1k papers receiving 358.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
- Inorganic Chemistry 58.2k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 61.7k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 27.2k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 92.1k
- Materials Chemistry 135.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Molecular Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Molecular Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Molecular Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Molecular Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Molecular Science
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Molecular Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Molecular Science at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Molecular Science
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Molecular Science have published 11.4k papers, which have received a total of 362.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.9k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1.1k papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 2.1k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 1.5k papers in Spectroscopy and 1.3k papers in Inorganic Chemistry on the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.8k papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (1.3k papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (1.2k papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (1.1k papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (709 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (528 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (526 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (520 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (58.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (61.7k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (27.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (92.1k citations) and Materials Chemistry (135.6k citations). Authors at Institute for Molecular Science collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, Chemistry Letters, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan and Journal of the American Chemical Society. Some of Institute for Molecular Science's most productive authors include Donglin Jiang, Yuko Okamoto, Fumio Hirata, Eizi Hirota, Shigeru Nagase, Koji Kimata, Yuji Sugita, Tatsuya Tsukuda, Yasuhiro Uozumi and Yuichi Negishi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.