Institute for Molecular Science
Impact in
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 0.5%
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
-
- Organic and Molecular Conductors Research
Papers in
-
- Organic and Molecular Conductors Research 1.1k
-
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies 435
- Top scholars
- Donglin JiangYuko OkamotoFumio HirataYuji SugitaEizi HirotaShigeru NagaseYasuhiro UozumiTatsuya Tsukuda
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (859 papers)Chemical Physics Letters (609 papers)Chemistry Letters (361 papers)Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan (346 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (296 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Institute for Molecular Science
10.8k papers receiving 346.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 29.9k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 43.6k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 73.7k
- Inorganic Chemistry 31.5k
- Organic Chemistry 59.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Molecular Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Molecular Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Molecular Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Molecular Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Molecular Science
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Molecular Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Molecular Science at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Molecular Science
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Molecular Science have published 11.1k papers, which have received a total of 354.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.7k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 981 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 2.7k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 893 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 950 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (1.1k papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (791 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (769 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (683 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (657 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (435 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (432 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (418 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (29.9k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (43.6k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (73.7k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (31.5k citations) and Organic Chemistry (59.3k citations). Authors at Institute for Molecular Science collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, Chemistry Letters, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan and Journal of the American Chemical Society. Some of Institute for Molecular Science's most productive authors include Donglin Jiang, Yuko Okamoto, Fumio Hirata, Yuji Sugita, Eizi Hirota, Shigeru Nagase, Yasuhiro Uozumi, Tatsuya Tsukuda, Yuichi Negishi and Makoto Fujita.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.