Institute of Geodesy and Cartography

780 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Peers

Institute of Geodesy and Cartography
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Oceanography 1.6k
  • Environmental Engineering 1.8k
  • Geology 557
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.9k
  • Atmospheric Science 1.2k
Replace Geographical Institute with:
Geographical Institute Hungary
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics Czechia
Centrum Badań Kosmicznych Poland
Geodetic Institute of Slovenia Slovenia
Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Poland
Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology Germany
Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences Poland
HUN-REN Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science Hungary
Croatian Geological Survey Croatia
Institute of Nature Conservation Poland
Institute of Geodesy and Cartography relative to Geographical Institute Hungary Geographical Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Geographical Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Geodesy and Cartography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Geodesy and Cartography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Geodesy and Cartography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Geodesy and Cartography more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Geodesy and Cartography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Geodesy and Cartography at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Geodesy and Cartography at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Geodesy and Cartography

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Geodesy and Cartography have published 952 papers, which have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 89 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 179 papers in Oceanography, 73 papers in Geology, 78 papers in Urban Studies and 13 papers in Space and Planetary Science on the topics of Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (168 papers), Polish socio-economic development (90 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (84 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (79 papers), Integrated Water Resources Management (75 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (65 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (61 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (60 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (1.6k citations), Environmental Engineering (1.8k citations), Geology (557 citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.9k citations) and Atmospheric Science (1.2k citations). Authors at Institute of Geodesy and Cartography collaborate with scholars in Poland, United Kingdom and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Remote Sensing, Przegląd Geograficzny, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing and International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. Some of Institute of Geodesy and Cartography's most productive authors include Biswajeet Pradhan, Przemysław Śleszyński, Milan Burša, Agata Hościło, Katarzyna Dąbrowska‐Zielińska, Maciej Bartold, Jerzy Bański, Hana Krásná, Michael Schindelegger and Tobias Nilsson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact