Institute for the Future

1.3k papers receiving 25.1k citations

Peers

Institute for the Future
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Health Informatics 311
  • Computer Science Applications 864
  • Business and International Management 232
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 708
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.0k
Replace California State University, East Bay with:
California State University, East Bay United States
California State University, Bakersfield United States
Kingston University United States
Institute for Learning Innovation United States
Fielding Graduate University United States
Seattle Pacific University United States
University of Washington Bothell United States
Southern Oregon University United States
Gonzaga University United States
Collins College United States
Institute for the Future relative to California State University, East Bay United States California State University, East Bay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
California State University, East Bay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for the Future

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for the Future. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for the Future with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for the Future more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for the Future

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for the Future at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for the Future at the time of their publication.

About Institute for the Future

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for the Future have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 29.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 112 papers in Computer Science Applications, 22 papers in Business and International Management, 73 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 13 papers in Health Informatics and 72 papers in Media Technology on the topics of E-Learning and Knowledge Management (59 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (50 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (47 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (46 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (36 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (35 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (29 papers) and Educational Research and Science Teaching (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Informatics (311 citations), Computer Science Applications (864 citations), Business and International Management (232 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (708 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (2.0k citations). Authors at Institute for the Future collaborate with scholars in United States, Mexico and China and have published in prestigious journals including Futures, Surgical Endoscopy, Journal of the American Chemical Society, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine and Sustainability. Some of Institute for the Future's most productive authors include Robyn Stone, Thaddeus R. Miller, Sheila M. Olmstead, Katina Michael, Helaine E. Resnick, Samira Hosseini, Maria-Soledad RAMIREZ-MONTOYA, Robert Johansen, Michael S. Shur and Evangelos Spiliotis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact