Institute of Cancer Research

973.5k citations
18.4k papers ·

Impact in

    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Oncology top 0.5%
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Papers in

    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 753
    • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 497
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 491

Institute of Cancer Research

16.6k papers receiving 872.7k citations

Peers

Institute of Cancer Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Cancer Research 130.2k
  • Oncology 220.6k
  • Molecular Biology 399.1k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 120.0k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 84.0k
Replace Cancer Research UK with:
Cancer Research UK United Kingdom
Hammersmith Hospital United Kingdom
Institut Gustave Roussy France
Institut Curie France
The Netherlands Cancer Institute Netherlands
Institut Pasteur France
Hôpital Saint-Louis France
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades France
Oncode Institute Netherlands
Royal Marsden Hospital United Kingdom
Institute of Cancer Research relative to Cancer Research UK United Kingdom Cancer Research UK's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Cancer Research UK · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Cancer Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Cancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Cancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Cancer Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Cancer Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Cancer Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Cancer Research at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Cancer Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Cancer Research have published 18.4k papers, which have received a total of 973.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.3k papers in Cancer Research, 4.2k papers in Oncology, 2.5k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 966 papers in Radiation and 3.1k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (839 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (753 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (740 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (718 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (589 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (497 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (491 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (491 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (130.2k citations), Oncology (220.6k citations), Molecular Biology (399.1k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (120.0k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (84.0k citations). Authors at Institute of Cancer Research collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Annals of Oncology, Nature and Blood. Some of Institute of Cancer Research's most productive authors include Christopher J. Marshall, Alan Ashworth, Paul Workman, C. J. Marshall, Mel Greaves, Jorge S. Reis‐Filho, David H. Phillips, Nicholas C. Turner, Richard S. Houlston and Christopher J. Lord.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact