Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal

9.2k citations
352 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal

339 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Peers

Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Fuel Technology 214
  • Biomedical Engineering 4.1k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 539
  • Catalysis 578
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.0k
Replace Petrol (Poland) with:
Petrol (Poland) Poland
Sachtleben Bergbau (Germany) Germany
ORLEN UniCRE Czechia
Danish Geotechnical Society Denmark
Institute For Ecology of Industrial Areas Poland
Institute for Renewable Energy (Poland) Poland
Łukasiewicz Research Network - Wood Technology Institute Poland
Chemopharma (Austria) Austria
Institut für Nichtklassische Chemie Germany
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale La Chimica Per L'Ambiente Italy
Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal relative to Petrol (Poland) Poland Petrol (Poland)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Petrol (Poland) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal have published 352 papers, which have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 29 papers in Fuel Technology, 28 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 165 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 127 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 22 papers in Catalysis on the topics of Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (121 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (37 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (30 papers), Coal and Coke Industries Research (29 papers), Coal and Its By-products (27 papers), Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing (26 papers), Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes (22 papers) and Industrial Gas Emission Control (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Fuel Technology (214 citations), Biomedical Engineering (4.1k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (539 citations), Catalysis (578 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.0k citations). Authors at Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal collaborate with scholars in Poland, Taiwan and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Fuel, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, Energy and Energies. Some of Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal's most productive authors include K. Srogi, Janusz Lasek, Marcin Sajdak, M. Ściążko, Roksana Muzyka, J. Zuwała, Ewelina Ksepko, T. Chmielniak, Sabina Drewniak and Jeffrey C.S. Wu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact