Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA

3.4k citations
443 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA

339 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Ceramics and Composites 307
  • Catalysis 207
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
  • General Materials Science 58
Replace University of Georgia with:
University of Georgia Georgia
Moscow State Industrial University Russia
Islamic Azad University of Marand Iran
Iran's National Elites Foundation Iran
Rostov State University of Civil Engineering Russia
Ahl Al Bayt University Iraq
Institute of Physics. HI Amirkhanova Russia
Yerevan State Linguistic University Armenia
Research Institute of Technology (Russia) Russia
Islamic Azad University of Farahan Iran
Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA relative to University of Georgia Georgia University of Georgia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
University of Georgia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA have published 443 papers, which have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Catalysis, 32 papers in Ceramics and Composites, 15 papers in General Materials Science, 140 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 165 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Advanced materials and composites (73 papers), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (66 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (37 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (31 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (30 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (25 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (23 papers) and Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ceramics and Composites (307 citations), Catalysis (207 citations), Mechanical Engineering (1.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations) and General Materials Science (58 citations). Authors at Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA collaborate with scholars in Armenia, Russia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Ceramics International, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Chemical Engineering Journal, Materials and International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. Some of Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA's most productive authors include S. L. Kharatyan, Hovakim Zakaryan, Khachatur V. Manukyan, Erik Arabyan, Keivan Zandi, Adrian Oo, Sofiya Aydinyan, S. K. Dolukhanyan, Irina Hussainova and Alexander S. Mukasyan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact