Institute for Biomedical Engineering

335.2k citations
7.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute for Biomedical Engineering

6.3k papers receiving 311.2k citations

Peers

Institute for Biomedical Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 16.5k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 39.7k
  • Biomedical Engineering 58.8k
  • Biomaterials 16.7k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 23.5k
Replace Universität Ulm with:
Universität Ulm Germany
Novartis (Switzerland) Switzerland
Université Joseph Fourier France
University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
Innsbruck Medical University Austria
University Hospital of Zurich Switzerland
Helmholtz Zentrum München Germany
University Medical Center Freiburg Germany
University of Rostock Germany
National Research Council Italy
Institute for Biomedical Engineering relative to Universität Ulm Germany Universität Ulm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Universität Ulm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Biomedical Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Biomedical Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Biomedical Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Biomedical Engineering at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Biomedical Engineering at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Biomedical Engineering

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Biomedical Engineering have published 7.1k papers, which have received a total of 335.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 370 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 53 papers in Structural Biology, 294 papers in Radiation and 1.3k papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (603 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (239 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (209 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (209 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (203 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (201 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (182 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (181 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (16.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (39.7k citations), Biomedical Engineering (58.8k citations), Biomaterials (16.7k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (23.5k citations). Authors at Institute for Biomedical Engineering collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Nature Communications, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage. Some of Institute for Biomedical Engineering's most productive authors include Peter Boesiger, Ralph Müller, Jeffrey A. Hubbell, Klaas P. Pruessmann, P. Rüegsegger, Markus Weiger, Sebastian Kozerke, Marco Stampanoni, T. Hildebrand and János Vörös.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact