Instituto de Botanica Darwinion
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Plant and animal studies
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 334
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 292
- Plant and animal studies 177
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology 91
- Plant Science 435
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 193
- Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna 118
- Top scholars
- Fernando O. ZuloagaOsvaldo MorroneLiliana M. GiussaniElizabeth A. KelloggSandra S. AliscioniLone AagesenNataly O’LearyRaúl Pozner
- Journals
- Phytotaxa (54 papers)Taxon (46 papers)Systematic Botany (46 papers)Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (39 papers)Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (31 papers)
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Instituto de Botanica Darwinion
793 papers receiving 9.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 6.5k
- Plant Science 4.6k
- Ecological Modeling 387
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.0k
- Forestry 309
Countries citing scholars working at Instituto de Botanica Darwinion
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto de Botanica Darwinion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto de Botanica Darwinion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto de Botanica Darwinion more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto de Botanica Darwinion
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto de Botanica Darwinion at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto de Botanica Darwinion at the time of their publication.
About Instituto de Botanica Darwinion
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto de Botanica Darwinion have published 873 papers, which have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 698 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 435 papers in Plant Science, 32 papers in Forestry, 21 papers in Ecological Modeling and 82 papers in Food Science on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (334 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (292 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (193 papers), Plant and animal studies (177 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (118 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (100 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (91 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (72 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (6.5k citations), Plant Science (4.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (387 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.0k citations) and Forestry (309 citations). Authors at Instituto de Botanica Darwinion collaborate with scholars in Argentina, United States and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Taxon, Systematic Botany, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. Some of Instituto de Botanica Darwinion's most productive authors include Fernando O. Zuloaga, Osvaldo Morrone, Liliana M. Giussani, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, Sandra S. Aliscioni, Lone Aagesen, Nataly O’Leary, Raúl Pozner, Andrea Mariel Sanso and Gustavo F. Scarpa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.