Institute of Applied Physics

11.7k citations
916 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Applied Physics

796 papers receiving 11.3k citations

Peers

Institute of Applied Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 3.1k
  • Radiation 497
  • Numerical Analysis 289
Replace Plasma (Russia) with:
Plasma (Russia) Russia
Moscow State University of Environmental Engineering Russia
Institute of Applied Mechanics Russia
All Russia Research Institute of Automatics Russia
Francisk Skorina Gomel State University Belarus
Donetsk Institute for Physics and Engineering named after O.O. Galkin Ukraine
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Physical-Technical and Radiotechnical Measurements Russia
Nuclear Safety Institute Russia
Institute of Magnetism Ukraine
S. P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia (Russia) Russia
Institute of Applied Physics relative to Plasma (Russia) Russia Plasma (Russia)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Plasma (Russia) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Applied Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Applied Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Applied Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Applied Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Applied Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Applied Physics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Applied Physics at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Applied Physics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Applied Physics have published 916 papers, which have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 104 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 67 papers in Radiation, 50 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 205 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 62 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (82 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (61 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (47 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (46 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (40 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (38 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (36 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (3.1k citations), Radiation (497 citations) and Numerical Analysis (289 citations). Authors at Institute of Applied Physics collaborate with scholars in Ukraine, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Laser Physics, The European Physical Journal D, Laser Physics Letters and Scientific Reports. Some of Institute of Applied Physics's most productive authors include S. P. Roshchupkin, Vasyl O. Kharchenko, Dmitrii O. Kharchenko, S. N. Danilchenko, Cong Wang, Jun Yan, Dafang Li, Ping Zhang, A. A. Lebed’ and Zhen‐Guo Fu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact