Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier
Impact in
- Forestry top 5%
- Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Papers in
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development 62
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 46
- Forestry 49
- Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems 40
- Top scholars
- Paolo ProsperiHatem BelhouchetteNicole DarmonMechthild DonnerGuillermo FlichmanWajid NasimShah FahadThomas Allen
- Journals
- Agricultural Systems (22 papers)Environmental Science and Pollution Research (17 papers)Global Food Security (13 papers)Public Health Nutrition (12 papers)Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier
651 papers receiving 12.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6k
- Forestry 526
- Environmental Chemistry 820
- Soil Science 1.2k
- Horticulture 49
Countries citing scholars working at Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier at the time of their publication.
About Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier have published 720 papers, which have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 165 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 49 papers in Forestry, 7 papers in Horticulture, 55 papers in Environmental Chemistry and 45 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (62 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (53 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (51 papers), Agricultural economics and policies (46 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (46 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (40 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (35 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (1.6k citations), Forestry (526 citations), Environmental Chemistry (820 citations), Soil Science (1.2k citations) and Horticulture (49 citations). Authors at Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier collaborate with scholars in France, Italy and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Agricultural Systems, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Global Food Security, Public Health Nutrition and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. Some of Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier's most productive authors include Paolo Prosperi, Hatem Belhouchette, Nicole Darmon, Mechthild Donner, Guillermo Flichman, Wajid Nasim, Shah Fahad, Thomas Allen, Éric Justes and M.K. van Ittersum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.