Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Papers in
- Instrumentation 479
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 475
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 855
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 558
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 537
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 485
- Astro and Planetary Science 415
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 215
- Top scholars
- Nuno SantosFrancisco S. N. LoboMichel MayorG. IsraelianStephane udryMasato MinamitsujiCarlos HerdeiroNoemi Frusciante
In The Last Decade
Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences
1.9k papers receiving 52.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Instrumentation 12.6k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 49.3k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 14.5k
- Oceanography 1.9k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.9k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 53.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 479 papers in Instrumentation, 1.9k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 583 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 97 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 50 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (855 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (558 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (537 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (485 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (475 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (415 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (368 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (215 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (12.6k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (49.3k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (14.5k citations), Oceanography (1.9k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.9k citations). Authors at Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences collaborate with scholars in Portugal, France and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal and Physics Letters B. Some of Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences's most productive authors include Nuno Santos, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Michel Mayor, G. Israelian, Stephane udry, Masato Minamitsuji, Carlos Herdeiro, Noemi Frusciante, José P. S. Lemos and Pedro Pina Avelino.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.