Unilever (India)

10.0k citations
383 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Unilever (India)

343 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Peers

Unilever (India)
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Biochemistry 434
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 457
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 450
  • Dermatology 460
  • Biomaterials 696
Replace Procter & Gamble (India) with:
Procter & Gamble (India) India
Sun Pharma Advanced Research (India) India
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (India) India
Piramal (India) India
National Centre for Compositional Characterisation of Materials India
Biological E (India) India
Nirma (India) India
Bhopal Memorial Hospital & Research Centre India
Pandit Sundarlal Sharma Open University India
Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University India
Unilever (India) relative to Procter & Gamble (India) India Procter & Gamble (India)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Procter & Gamble (India) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Unilever (India)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Unilever (India). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Unilever (India) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unilever (India) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Unilever (India)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Unilever (India) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Unilever (India) at the time of their publication.

About Unilever (India)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Unilever (India) have published 383 papers, which have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 26 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 29 papers in Dermatology, 19 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 18 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine and 29 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (32 papers), Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity (24 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (17 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (15 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (15 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (14 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (13 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (434 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (457 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (450 citations), Dermatology (460 citations) and Biomaterials (696 citations). Authors at Unilever (India) collaborate with scholars in India, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Langmuir, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. Some of Unilever (India)'s most productive authors include Philip Sherman, S. Jayaraman Suresh, Samiran Mahapatra, Prasun Bandyopadhyay, Vijay M. Naik, Jaideep Chatterjee, Gautam Banerjee, Aniruddha Bhalchandra Pandit, Amitava Pramanik and Arpita Sarkar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact