Health Promotion Board

8.8k citations
316 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Health Promotion Board

242 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

Health Promotion Board
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Physiology 1.1k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 616
  • Biochemistry 226
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 426
Replace MOH Holdings with:
MOH Holdings Singapore
Singapore College of Traditional Chinese Medicine Singapore
Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital Malaysia
Hospital Seberang Jaya Malaysia
Sultan Ismail Specialist Hospital Malaysia
Woodlands Health Campus Singapore
Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah Malaysia
Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute Singapore
Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Thailand
Social Security Office (Thailand) Thailand
Health Promotion Board relative to MOH Holdings Singapore MOH Holdings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
MOH Holdings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Health Promotion Board

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Health Promotion Board. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Health Promotion Board with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Promotion Board more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Health Promotion Board

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Health Promotion Board at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Health Promotion Board at the time of their publication.

About Health Promotion Board

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Health Promotion Board have published 316 papers, which have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9 papers in Periodontics, 45 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 37 papers in Physiology, 29 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 1 paper in Research and Theory on the topics of Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (27 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (19 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (15 papers), Physical Activity and Health (11 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (11 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (9 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (9 papers) and Dental Health and Care Utilization (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physiology (1.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (616 citations), Biochemistry (226 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (426 citations). Authors at Health Promotion Board collaborate with scholars in Singapore, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, BMC Public Health, Nutrients and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. Some of Health Promotion Board's most productive authors include Mabel Deurenberg‐Yap, Paul Deurenberg, Woon‐Puay Koh, Khuan Yew Chow, Aizhen Jin, S K Chew, Gek Hsiang Lim, Jian‐Min Yuan, Tze Pin Ng and Huili Zheng.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact