Government of the United Kingdom

30.9k citations
882 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Government of the United Kingdom

720 papers receiving 27.8k citations

Peers

Government of the United Kingdom
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Public Administration 789
  • Orthodontics 800
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 893
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.3k
  • Soil Science 1.3k
Replace London International Development Centre with:
London International Development Centre United Kingdom
Birmingham Research Park United Kingdom
Antwerp Management School Belgium
Sheffield City Council United Kingdom
Merseytravel United Kingdom
Environmental Health United Kingdom
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Belgium
Cheshire West and Chester United Kingdom
Overseas Development Institute United Kingdom
Flemish Government Belgium
Government of the United Kingdom relative to London International Development Centre United Kingdom London International Development Centre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.6×
London International Development Centre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Government of the United Kingdom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Government of the United Kingdom. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Government of the United Kingdom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Government of the United Kingdom more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Government of the United Kingdom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Government of the United Kingdom at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Government of the United Kingdom at the time of their publication.

About Government of the United Kingdom

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Government of the United Kingdom have published 882 papers, which have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 47 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 32 papers in Orthodontics, 18 papers in Public Administration, 124 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 29 papers in Oral Surgery on the topics of Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (46 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (37 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (32 papers), Dental materials and restorations (32 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (25 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (24 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (22 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Administration (789 citations), Orthodontics (800 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (893 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (1.3k citations) and Soil Science (1.3k citations). Authors at Government of the United Kingdom collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Dentistry, The Science of The Total Environment, The Political Quarterly, West European Politics and Nature. Some of Government of the United Kingdom's most productive authors include John Rex Beddington, Sandy M Thomas, Jules Pretty, Camilla Toulmin, Sherman Robinson, David P. Lawrence, James Muir, I. R. Crute, Lawrence Haddad and Patrick Dunleavy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact