Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 31
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 30
-
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies 31
- Top scholars
- Alvin KH KwokKar Neng LaiEdmond S.K.Timothy Y. Y. LaiAva KwongChi-Lai HoJason C. YamGladys Lo
- Journals
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (13 papers)World Journal of Surgery (12 papers)Cancers (11 papers)Scientific Reports (10 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital
799 papers receiving 19.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Ophthalmology 2.7k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 4.6k
- Hepatology 1.4k
- Otorhinolaryngology 709
- Cancer Research 2.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital at the time of their publication.
About Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital have published 974 papers, which have received a total of 23.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 77 papers in Ophthalmology, 33 papers in Otorhinolaryngology, 176 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 60 papers in Radiation and 39 papers in Hepatology on the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (60 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (43 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (36 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (35 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (35 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (31 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (31 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (2.7k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (4.6k citations), Hepatology (1.4k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (709 citations) and Cancer Research (2.3k citations). Authors at Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital collaborate with scholars in Hong Kong, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, World Journal of Surgery, Cancers, Scientific Reports and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Some of Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital's most productive authors include Alvin KH Kwok, Kar Neng Lai, Edmond S.K., Timothy Y. Y. Lai, Ava Kwong, Chi-Lai Ho, Jason C. Yam, Gladys Lo, John S.M. Chang and Alvin K.H. Kwok.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.