Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale

4.6k citations
445 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale

401 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Infectious Diseases 698
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 520
  • Social Psychology 460
  • Pharmacy 73
  • General Health Professions 404
Replace Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice with:
Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice France
University of Applied Sciences Leiden Netherlands
NatCen Social Research United Kingdom
Addiction Switzerland Switzerland
Dynamique des Capacités Humaines et des Conduites de Santé France
St Pancras Hospital United Kingdom
St Charles Hospital United Kingdom
Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie: Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social
GGNet Netherlands
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust United Kingdom
Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale relative to Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice France Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale at the time of their publication.

About Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale have published 445 papers, which have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 58 papers in Infectious Diseases, 69 papers in Social Psychology, 54 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in General Psychology and 7 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (58 papers), Social Representations and Identity (33 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (28 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (14 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (13 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (13 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (13 papers) and Technostress in Professional Settings (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (698 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (520 citations), Social Psychology (460 citations), Pharmacy (73 citations) and General Health Professions (404 citations). Authors at Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale collaborate with scholars in France, Canada and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including AIDS Care, PLoS ONE, AIDS and Behavior, Psycho-Oncology and BMJ Open. Some of Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale's most productive authors include Nikos Kalampalikis, Nicolas Fieulaine, Marc-Éric Bobillier Chaumon, Marie Préau, Maciej Stolarski, Tanguy Leroy, Wessel van Beek, Thémis Apostolidis, Bruno Spire and Pascal Auquier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact