Global Policy Institute

16.7k citations
685 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 25
    • Climate Change Policy and Economics 20
    • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 20

Global Policy Institute

497 papers receiving 13.8k citations

Peers

Global Policy Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Modeling and Simulation 640
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.4k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.1k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.8k
  • Health 541
Replace National Academy of Engineering with:
National Academy of Engineering United States
American Association For The Advancement of Science United States
United States Department of Homeland Security United States
National Health Council United States
Carnegie Hall United States
United Nations Population Fund United States
Innovations for Poverty Action United States
Sustainable Development Institute United States
Council on Foreign Relations United States
Bread for the World Institute United States
Global Policy Institute relative to National Academy of Engineering United States National Academy of Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.4×
National Academy of Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Global Policy Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Global Policy Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Global Policy Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Policy Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Global Policy Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Global Policy Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Global Policy Institute at the time of their publication.

About Global Policy Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Global Policy Institute have published 685 papers, which have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 105 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 22 papers in Health, 11 papers in Development, 62 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (25 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (20 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (20 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (20 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (18 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (16 papers), Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting (14 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Modeling and Simulation (640 citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.4k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.8k citations) and Health (541 citations). Authors at Global Policy Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Health Affairs, BMJ Open, PLoS ONE, BMJ Global Health and Frontiers in Public Health. Some of Global Policy Institute's most productive authors include Tim K. Mackey, Tamma Carleton, Solomon Hsiang, Sandra Postel, Gavin Yamey, Gretchen C. Daily, Paul R. Ehrlich, Raphael Cuomo, Gaurvika M. L. Nayyar and Ragui Assaad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact