Great Lakes Fishery Commission
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Aquatic Science top 10%
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Papers in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 183
-
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies 42
- Top scholars
- Charles C. KruegerRandy L. EshenroderAndrew Michael MuirGavin C. ChristieMichael J. SiefkesJohn M. DettmersMara S. ZimmermanSteven J. Cooke
- Journals
- Journal of Great Lakes Research (73 papers)Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (24 papers)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (19 papers)Fisheries (11 papers)North American Journal of Fisheries Management (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNorway
In The Last Decade
Great Lakes Fishery Commission
257 papers receiving 6.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.2k
- Aquatic Science 855
- Physiology 204
- Ecology 1k
- Global and Planetary Change 823
Countries citing scholars working at Great Lakes Fishery Commission
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Great Lakes Fishery Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Great Lakes Fishery Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Great Lakes Fishery Commission more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Great Lakes Fishery Commission
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Great Lakes Fishery Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Great Lakes Fishery Commission at the time of their publication.
About Great Lakes Fishery Commission
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Great Lakes Fishery Commission have published 271 papers, which have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 186 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 45 papers in Aquatic Science, 13 papers in Physiology, 32 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 31 papers in Ecology on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (183 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (42 papers), Marine and fisheries research (27 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (15 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (13 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (12 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (9 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.2k citations), Aquatic Science (855 citations), Physiology (204 citations), Ecology (1k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (823 citations). Authors at Great Lakes Fishery Commission collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Norway and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Great Lakes Research, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Some of Great Lakes Fishery Commission's most productive authors include Charles C. Krueger, Randy L. Eshenroder, Andrew Michael Muir, Gavin C. Christie, Michael J. Siefkes, John M. Dettmers, Mara S. Zimmerman, Steven J. Cooke, Michael J. Hansen and Charles R. Bronte.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.