Great Lakes Fishery Commission

6.3k citations
261 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Great Lakes Fishery Commission

242 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Great Lakes Fishery Commission
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.8k
  • Aquatic Science 1.2k
  • Ecology 3.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.6k
  • Physiology 169
Replace Shedd Aquarium with:
Shedd Aquarium United States
Indiana Department of Natural Resources United States
West Virginia Division of Natural Resources United States
Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission United States
The Ocean Foundation United States
World Wildlife Fund Canada Canada
University of Michigan Biological Station United States
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission United States
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Canada
Illinois Department of Agriculture United States
Great Lakes Fishery Commission relative to Shedd Aquarium United States Shedd Aquarium's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Shedd Aquarium · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Great Lakes Fishery Commission

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Great Lakes Fishery Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Great Lakes Fishery Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Great Lakes Fishery Commission more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Great Lakes Fishery Commission

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Great Lakes Fishery Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Great Lakes Fishery Commission at the time of their publication.

About Great Lakes Fishery Commission

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Great Lakes Fishery Commission have published 261 papers, which have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 214 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 51 papers in Aquatic Science, 137 papers in Ecology, 59 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 28 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (214 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (50 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (41 papers), Marine and fisheries research (40 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (35 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (19 papers) and Ecology and biodiversity studies (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.8k citations), Aquatic Science (1.2k citations), Ecology (3.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.6k citations) and Physiology (169 citations). Authors at Great Lakes Fishery Commission collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Norway and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Great Lakes Research, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Some of Great Lakes Fishery Commission's most productive authors include Charles C. Krueger, Randy L. Eshenroder, Gavin C. Christie, Andrew M. Muir, Michael J. Siefkes, John M. Dettmers, Mara S. Zimmerman, Steven J. Cooke, Chris Goddard and Charles R. Bronte.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact