Global Environment Facility
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
Papers in
-
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management 23
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 22
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 21
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance 17
- Top scholars
- Juha I. UittoBrenden JongmanStéphane HallegatteMark PellingAlfred M. DudaJulie RozenbergGustavo A. B. da FonsecaPhilip J. Ward
- Journals
- Nature Climate Change (6 papers)BMJ Global Health (5 papers)Conservation Letters (5 papers)Injury Prevention (5 papers)Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Global Environment Facility
276 papers receiving 11.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Global and Planetary Change 4.3k
- Ecological Modeling 499
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1.2k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.2k
- Ecology 1.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Global Environment Facility
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Global Environment Facility. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Global Environment Facility with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Environment Facility more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Global Environment Facility
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Global Environment Facility at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Global Environment Facility at the time of their publication.
About Global Environment Facility
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Global Environment Facility have published 329 papers, which have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 96 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 46 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 26 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 16 papers in Transportation and 9 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Traffic and Road Safety (25 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (23 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (22 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (21 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (17 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (16 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (15 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (4.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (499 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.2k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.2k citations) and Ecology (1.7k citations). Authors at Global Environment Facility collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Climate Change, BMJ Global Health, Conservation Letters, Injury Prevention and Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. Some of Global Environment Facility's most productive authors include Juha I. Uitto, Brenden Jongman, Stéphane Hallegatte, Mark Pelling, Alfred M. Duda, Julie Rozenberg, Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca, Philip J. Ward, Kenneth Sherman and Kiran Dev Pandey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.