Federal Penitentiary Service
Impact in
- Law top 10%
- Criminal Justice and Penology
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
Papers in
- Law 226
- Criminal Justice and Penology 171
-
- Criminal Law and Policy 107
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 32
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 29
- Top scholars
- Robert L. DenneyRichard I. FrederickFred Michael SpeedAlexander Valerievich DushkinИнна Борисовна БовинаDmitry Olegovich BokovS. S. ShinDavid F. Duncan
- Journals
- Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews (6 papers)Russian Journal of Criminology (40 papers)Assessment (2 papers)International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) (2 papers)American Psychologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- RussiaPeruUnited States
In The Last Decade
Federal Penitentiary Service
515 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Law 198
- Social Psychology 161
- Applied Psychology 35
- Information Systems 149
- Clinical Psychology 106
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Penitentiary Service
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Penitentiary Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Penitentiary Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Penitentiary Service more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Penitentiary Service
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Penitentiary Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Penitentiary Service at the time of their publication.
About Federal Penitentiary Service
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Penitentiary Service have published 881 papers, which have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 226 papers in Law, 240 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 113 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 11 papers in Development and 63 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Criminal Justice and Penology (171 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (107 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (32 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (29 papers), Agricultural Development and Policies (23 papers), Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies (23 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (22 papers) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Law (198 citations), Social Psychology (161 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Information Systems (149 citations) and Clinical Psychology (106 citations). Authors at Federal Penitentiary Service collaborate with scholars in Russia, Peru and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, Russian Journal of Criminology, Assessment, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) and American Psychologist. Some of Federal Penitentiary Service's most productive authors include Robert L. Denney, Richard I. Frederick, Fred Michael Speed, Alexander Valerievich Dushkin, Инна Борисовна Бовина, Dmitry Olegovich Bokov, S. S. Shin, David F. Duncan, Yevgeny G Andreev and Jennifer Joan Furin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.