Swiss National Science Foundation
Impact in
-
- HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Papers in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 22
-
- Academic Publishing and Open Access 12
- Research, Science, and Academia 11
- Top scholars
- Pierre‐Alain ClavienP.Robert C. HarveySteven M. StrasbergDieter SeebàchAmalio TelentiThierry BuclinLaurent Arthur DecosterdJérôme Biollaz
- Journals
- Helvetica Chimica Acta (33 papers)AIDS (10 papers)Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (9 papers)Critical Care Medicine (8 papers)Chemistry & Biodiversity (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Swiss National Science Foundation
587 papers receiving 17.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 293
- Infectious Diseases 1.3k
- Virology 282
- Pharmacology 571
- Emergency Medical Services 368
Countries citing scholars working at Swiss National Science Foundation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Swiss National Science Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Swiss National Science Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Swiss National Science Foundation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Swiss National Science Foundation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Swiss National Science Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Swiss National Science Foundation at the time of their publication.
About Swiss National Science Foundation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Swiss National Science Foundation have published 665 papers, which have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 23 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 26 papers in Information Systems and Management, 33 papers in Ocean Engineering, 26 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 22 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (30 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (22 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (22 papers), African history and culture studies (14 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (13 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (12 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (11 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geriatrics and Gerontology (293 citations), Infectious Diseases (1.3k citations), Virology (282 citations), Pharmacology (571 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (368 citations). Authors at Swiss National Science Foundation collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Helvetica Chimica Acta, AIDS, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Critical Care Medicine and Chemistry & Biodiversity. Some of Swiss National Science Foundation's most productive authors include Pierre‐Alain Clavien, P.Robert C. Harvey, Steven M. Strasberg, Dieter Seebàch, Amalio Telenti, Thierry Buclin, Laurent Arthur Decosterd, Jérôme Biollaz, Martin Richard Tramèr and Armin Falk.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.