Fuzzy Systems Institute

5.4k citations
485 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fuzzy Systems Institute

398 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Fuzzy Systems Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1.7k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 586
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.4k
  • Management Information Systems 291
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 483
Replace Samsung SDS (South Korea) with:
Samsung SDS (South Korea) South Korea
Hiroshima Shudo University Japan
SUNY Korea South Korea
Korea National Defense University South Korea
Sungkyul University South Korea
Hanshin University South Korea
Busan University of Foreign Studies South Korea
Korean Intellectual Property Office South Korea
Daewoo Electronics (South Korea) South Korea
Visteon (South Korea) South Korea
Fuzzy Systems Institute relative to Samsung SDS (South Korea) South Korea Samsung SDS (South Korea)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Samsung SDS (South Korea) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fuzzy Systems Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fuzzy Systems Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fuzzy Systems Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fuzzy Systems Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fuzzy Systems Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fuzzy Systems Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fuzzy Systems Institute at the time of their publication.

About Fuzzy Systems Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fuzzy Systems Institute have published 485 papers, which have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 76 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 65 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 160 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 85 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 45 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics on the topics of Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (79 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (64 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (51 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (49 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (35 papers), Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (24 papers), Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (18 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1.7k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (586 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.4k citations), Management Information Systems (291 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (483 citations). Authors at Fuzzy Systems Institute collaborate with scholars in Japan, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Computers & Industrial Engineering, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems and Information Sciences. Some of Fuzzy Systems Institute's most productive authors include Mitsuo Gen, Kunihiko Fukushima, Chen–Fu Chien, Anca Ralescu, Xinjie Yu, A. Serdar Taşan, Wenqiang Zhang, Kanchana Sethanan, Lin Lin and Jianquan Guo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact