Qi2

9.3k citations
397 papers ·

Impact in

    • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
    • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
    • Granular flow and fluidized beds
    • Combustion and flame dynamics
    • Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

Papers in

Qi2

330 papers receiving 8.7k citations

Peers

Qi2
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Computational Mechanics 4.0k
  • Ocean Engineering 2.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 624
  • Earth-Surface Processes 734
  • Environmental Engineering 682
Replace Nielsen Engineering & Research (United States) with:
Nielsen Engineering & Research (United States) United States
OFM Research (United States) United States
Sierra Engineering (United States) United States
Software and Engineering Associates (United States) United States
Washington Sea Grant United States
Owl Research Institute United States
Sierra Nevada Corporation (United States) United States
ZRT Laboratory United States
Benchmark Research (United States) United States
Areté Associates (United States) United States
Qi2 relative to Nielsen Engineering & Research (United States) United States Nielsen Engineering & Research (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25.0×
Nielsen Engineering & Research (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Qi2

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Qi2. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Qi2 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qi2 more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Qi2

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Qi2 at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Qi2 at the time of their publication.

About Qi2

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Qi2 have published 397 papers, which have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 89 papers in Computational Mechanics, 12 papers in Ecological Modeling, 43 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 23 papers in Ocean Engineering and 14 papers in Applied Mathematics on the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (57 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (34 papers), Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (23 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (18 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (13 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (13 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (13 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computational Mechanics (4.0k citations), Ocean Engineering (2.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (624 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (734 citations) and Environmental Engineering (682 citations). Authors at Qi2 collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including AIAA Journal, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Medicine, Circulation and Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Some of Qi2's most productive authors include James J. Riley, Martin Maxey, M. Hashish, Mohamed Gad‐el‐Hak, Ralph W. Metcalfe, Suresh Menon, Steven A. Orszag, Wen-Huei Jou, Chih‐Ming Ho and Peter Cooper.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact