Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut

174.1k citations
6.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut

5.7k papers receiving 167.8k citations

Peers

Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 32.5k
  • Infectious Diseases 48.2k
  • Parasitology 16.4k
  • Virology 9.0k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 19.3k
Replace University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation with:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation Germany
Robert Koch Institute Germany
Statens Serum Institut Denmark
Swedish Veterinary Agency Sweden
European Molecular Biology Laboratory Germany
European Molecular Biology Laboratory Germany
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene Germany
Norwegian Veterinary Institute Norway
Institute of Virology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences Slovakia
Veterinary Research Institute Czechia
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut relative to University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation Germany University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut at the time of their publication.

About Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut have published 6.0k papers, which have received a total of 174.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 1.7k papers in Infectious Diseases, 522 papers in Parasitology, 356 papers in Virology and 426 papers in Microbiology on the topics of Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (990 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (774 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (716 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (479 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (466 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (369 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (356 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (335 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (32.5k citations), Infectious Diseases (48.2k citations), Parasitology (16.4k citations), Virology (9.0k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (19.3k citations). Authors at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Virology, Veterinary Microbiology, Viruses, PLoS ONE and Journal of General Virology. Some of Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut's most productive authors include Thomas C. Mettenleiter, Martin Beer, Štefan Schwarz, Gereon Schares, Barbara G. Klupp, Bernd Hoffmann, Harald Granzow, Franz J. Conraths, Sven Dänicke and Martin H. Groschup.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact