Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

2.4k papers receiving 30.4k citations

Peers

Fundação Faculdade de Medicina
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.6k
  • Biological Psychiatry 384
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 533
  • Occupational Therapy 534
  • Epidemiology 4.1k
Replace Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo with:
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo Brazil
Associação Paulista de Medicina Brazil
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC Brazil
Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto Brazil
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais Brazil
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA Brazil
Faculdade de Medicina de Marília Brazil
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre Brazil
Fundação Faculdade de Medicina relative to Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo Brazil Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundação Faculdade de Medicina. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundação Faculdade de Medicina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundação Faculdade de Medicina more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundação Faculdade de Medicina at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundação Faculdade de Medicina at the time of their publication.

About Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundação Faculdade de Medicina have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 36.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 72 papers in Occupational Therapy, 345 papers in General Health Professions, 284 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 69 papers in Parasitology and 328 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (173 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (74 papers), Public Health in Brazil (71 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (71 papers), Science and Education Research (57 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (50 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (46 papers) and Health Education and Validation (45 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (2.6k citations), Biological Psychiatry (384 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (533 citations), Occupational Therapy (534 citations) and Epidemiology (4.1k citations). Authors at Fundação Faculdade de Medicina collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Jornal de Pediatria, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz and Revista de Saúde Pública. Some of Fundação Faculdade de Medicina's most productive authors include Helena Maria Tannhauser Barros, Cláudio Telöken, Ernani Luı́s Rhoden, Ricardo Halpern, Heirie M. M. Mendez, James F. Reynolds, David De Jong, John M. Opitz, Rodrigo Machado‐Vieira and Pedro Alves d’Azevedo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact