Federal Emergency Management Agency

12.2k citations
843 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Federal Emergency Management Agency

718 papers receiving 11.5k citations

Peers

Federal Emergency Management Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Accounting 1.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 1.4k
  • Control and Systems Engineering 1.3k
  • Signal Processing 579
  • Emergency Medical Services 310
Replace TD Bank with:
TD Bank United States
Applied Biomathematics (United States) United States
Bureau of Labor Statistics United States
United States Department of Labor United States
Hudson Institute United States
SAS Institute (United States) United States
Access to Wholistic and Productive Living Institute United States
Cognizant (United States) United States
Impact Technology Development (United States) United States
Applied Research (United States) United States
Federal Emergency Management Agency relative to TD Bank United States TD Bank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.1×
TD Bank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal Emergency Management Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Emergency Management Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Emergency Management Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Emergency Management Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Emergency Management Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Emergency Management Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Emergency Management Agency at the time of their publication.

About Federal Emergency Management Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Emergency Management Agency have published 843 papers, which have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 25 papers in Health Information Management, 6 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 45 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 88 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 31 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Public Health and Nutrition (83 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (40 papers), Food and Agricultural Sciences (36 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (33 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (31 papers), Disaster Response and Management (30 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (28 papers) and Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Accounting (1.0k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (1.4k citations), Control and Systems Engineering (1.3k citations), Signal Processing (579 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (310 citations). Authors at Federal Emergency Management Agency collaborate with scholars in United States, France and Indonesia and have published in prestigious journals including Food and Chemical Toxicology, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Earthquake Spectra, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine and Natural Hazards. Some of Federal Emergency Management Agency's most productive authors include Pierre Apkarian, Cong Wang, Fei Xie, Ronald W. Masulis, Jean‐Marie Nicolas, Hoang Duong Tuan, Wendy B. Bostwick, Sean Esteban McCabe, Carol J. Boyd and Tonda L. Hughes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact