Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Impact in
Papers in
- Oral Surgery 81
- Top scholars
- Lydia Masako FerreiraAlexandre C. RibeiroMarco Túlio de MelloJair de Jesus MariLuiz E. MelloJohn RathboneMiguel PetrereLuciene Covolan
- Journals
- Jornal de Pediatria (36 papers)Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (28 papers)Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (27 papers)Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (17 papers)The FASEB Journal (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo
3.3k papers receiving 36.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 266
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.2k
- Oral Surgery 913
- Aquatic Science 1.0k
- Orthodontics 524
Countries citing scholars working at Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo at the time of their publication.
About Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo have published 4.2k papers, which have received a total of 44.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 21 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 81 papers in Oral Surgery, 49 papers in Orthodontics, 282 papers in General Health Professions and 44 papers in Otorhinolaryngology on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (160 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (80 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (75 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (61 papers), Business and Management Studies (55 papers), Health Education and Validation (50 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (49 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Issues, ethics and legal aspects (266 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (2.2k citations), Oral Surgery (913 citations), Aquatic Science (1.0k citations) and Orthodontics (524 citations). Authors at Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo collaborate with scholars in Brazil, Belgium and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Jornal de Pediatria, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira and The FASEB Journal. Some of Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo's most productive authors include Lydia Masako Ferreira, Alexandre C. Ribeiro, Marco Túlio de Mello, Jair de Jesus Mari, Luiz E. Mello, John Rathbone, Miguel Petrere, Luciene Covolan, Winson Wong and Ronaldo Laranjeira.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.