Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Instrumentation top 10%
Papers in
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 118
- Astro and Planetary Science 82
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 78
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 44
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 41
- Top scholars
- S. B. DubovichenkoPeter BerczikA. JustKuantay BoshkayevЛ. В. ТамбовцеваOrlando LuongoRainer SpurzemA. V. Kusakin
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (31 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (22 papers)Nuclear Physics A (15 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (12 papers)The European Physical Journal C (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- KazakhstanUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute
304 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.4k
- Instrumentation 231
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 633
- Radiation 118
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 223
Countries citing scholars working at Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute at the time of their publication.
About Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute have published 368 papers, which have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 239 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 41 papers in Instrumentation, 119 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 56 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 15 papers in Radiation on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (118 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (83 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (82 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (78 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (55 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (44 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (42 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.4k citations), Instrumentation (231 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (633 citations), Radiation (118 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (223 citations). Authors at Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute collaborate with scholars in Kazakhstan, United States and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear Physics A, The Astrophysical Journal and The European Physical Journal C. Some of Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute's most productive authors include S. B. Dubovichenko, Peter Berczik, A. Just, Kuantay Boshkayev, Л. В. Тамбовцева, Orlando Luongo, Rainer Spurzem, A. V. Kusakin, А. С. Мирошниченко and K. N. Grankin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.