ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Papers in
-
- Limits and Structures in Graph Theory 37
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 56
- Top scholars
- Lavinia HeisenbergJose Beltrán JiménezTomi KoivistoJohannes NollerMaria ColomboRobert BrandenbergerShinji TsujikawaGiuseppe Mingione
- Journals
- Physical review. D (21 papers)Journal of High Energy Physics (14 papers)Physical review. B. (6 papers)Communications in Mathematical Physics (6 papers)Physics Letters B (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies
240 papers receiving 9.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 4.3k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.5k
- Applied Mathematics 995
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 181
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 294
Countries citing scholars working at ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies at the time of their publication.
About ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies have published 264 papers, which have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 64 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 28 papers in Geometry and Topology, 29 papers in Mathematical Physics and 31 papers in Applied Mathematics on the topics of Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (56 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (37 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (23 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (16 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (16 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (13 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (12 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.3k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.5k citations), Applied Mathematics (995 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (181 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (294 citations). Authors at ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical review. B., Communications in Mathematical Physics and Physics Letters B. Some of ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies's most productive authors include Lavinia Heisenberg, Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Tomi Koivisto, Johannes Noller, Maria Colombo, Robert Brandenberger, Shinji Tsujikawa, Giuseppe Mingione, Paolo Baroni and Terence Hwa B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.