Eni Rewind (Italy)

14.5k citations
445 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Eni Rewind (Italy)

440 papers receiving 14.4k citations

Peers

Eni Rewind (Italy)
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Inorganic Chemistry 3.9k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 458
  • Catalysis 867
  • Polymers and Plastics 1.6k
  • Organic Chemistry 1.9k
Replace Snam (Italy) with:
Snam (Italy) Italy
Laboratoire des Matériaux Surfaces et Procédés pour la Catalyse France
Clariant (Germany) Germany
Total (Belgium) Belgium
Arkema (France) France
Lonza (Switzerland) Switzerland
Dow Chemical (Netherlands) Netherlands
Fraunhofer Institute for Microengineering and Microsystems Germany
Istituto di Metodologie Chimiche Italy
Service Interdisciplinaire sur les Systèmes Moléculaires et les Matériaux France
Eni Rewind (Italy) relative to Snam (Italy) Italy Snam (Italy)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Snam (Italy) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Eni Rewind (Italy)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Eni Rewind (Italy). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Eni Rewind (Italy) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eni Rewind (Italy) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Eni Rewind (Italy)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Eni Rewind (Italy) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Eni Rewind (Italy) at the time of their publication.

About Eni Rewind (Italy)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Eni Rewind (Italy) have published 445 papers, which have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 85 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 10 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 62 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 77 papers in Organic Chemistry and 17 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes on the topics of Polymer crystallization and properties (48 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (46 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (44 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (14 papers), Flame retardant materials and properties (14 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (13 papers) and biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (3.9k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (458 citations), Catalysis (867 citations), Polymers and Plastics (1.6k citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.9k citations). Authors at Eni Rewind (Italy) collaborate with scholars in Italy, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Polymer, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Journal of Materials Science, Polymer Degradation and Stability and Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry. Some of Eni Rewind (Italy)'s most productive authors include Giuseppe Leofanti, Gabriella Tozzola, Mario Padovan, Silvia Bordiga, Adriano Zecchina, Carlo Lamberti, Riccardo Pó, Franco Rivetti, Ugo Romano and Guido Petrini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact