East London NHS Foundation Trust
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 75
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 56
- Migration, Health and Trauma 45
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 43
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 108
- Top scholars
- Stefan PriebeFrank BesagPeter FonagyTrudie I. RossouwKamaldeep Singh BhuiAlan SimpsonFrank RöhrichtHayley B. McBain
- Journals
- BJPsych Open (38 papers)BMC Psychiatry (33 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (23 papers)BMJ Open (23 papers)PLoS ONE (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
East London NHS Foundation Trust
1.0k papers receiving 17.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
- Clinical Psychology 7.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.1k
- Biological Psychiatry 278
- General Health Professions 2.8k
- Social Psychology 2.4k
Countries citing scholars working at East London NHS Foundation Trust
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at East London NHS Foundation Trust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at East London NHS Foundation Trust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites East London NHS Foundation Trust more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at East London NHS Foundation Trust
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with East London NHS Foundation Trust at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with East London NHS Foundation Trust at the time of their publication.
About East London NHS Foundation Trust
In recent decades, authors affiliated with East London NHS Foundation Trust have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 412 papers in Clinical Psychology, 252 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 220 papers in General Health Professions, 29 papers in Conservation and 124 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (108 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (75 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (65 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (61 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (58 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (56 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (45 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (7.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (278 citations), General Health Professions (2.8k citations) and Social Psychology (2.4k citations). Authors at East London NHS Foundation Trust collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including BJPsych Open, BMC Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, BMJ Open and PLoS ONE. Some of East London NHS Foundation Trust's most productive authors include Stefan Priebe, Frank Besag, Peter Fonagy, Trudie I. Rossouw, Kamaldeep Singh Bhui, Alan Simpson, Frank Röhricht, Hayley B. McBain, Amar Shah and Martin William Orrell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.