United States Department of State

112.8k citations
4.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Department of State

3.3k papers receiving 98.5k citations

Peers

United States Department of State
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Infectious Diseases 9.0k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 2.2k
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 650
  • Clinical Psychology 8.5k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 3.8k
Replace In-Q-Tel with:
In-Q-Tel United States
Center for Innovation United States
Westat (United States) United States
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation United States
United States Public Health Service United States
United States Department of Health and Human Services United States
Mount Sinai Hospital United States
Impact Canada
National Center for Health Statistics United States
Public Health Ontario Canada
United States Department of State relative to In-Q-Tel United States In-Q-Tel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
In-Q-Tel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Department of State

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Department of State. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Department of State with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Department of State more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Department of State

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Department of State at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Department of State at the time of their publication.

About United States Department of State

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Department of State have published 4.0k papers, which have received a total of 112.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 101 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 302 papers in Infectious Diseases, 17 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology, 264 papers in General Health Professions and 332 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (114 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (94 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (84 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (75 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (64 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (64 papers), International Law and Human Rights (61 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (59 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (9.0k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (2.2k citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (650 citations), Clinical Psychology (8.5k citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (3.8k citations). Authors at United States Department of State collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and South Africa and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Industrial Medicine, American Journal of Epidemiology, The Journal of Immunology, American Journal of International Law and Science. Some of United States Department of State's most productive authors include Barbara A. Silverstein, Nedra Bartlett Belloc, Samuel Sutton, Nathalie J. Schmidt, Richard J. Bathurst, Lester Breslow, E. Roy John, Joseph Zubin, Gary M. Franklin and Elmer L. Struening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact