United States Department of Labor

1.6k papers receiving 35.0k citations

Peers

United States Department of Labor
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 2.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 4.0k
  • Forestry 677
  • Public Administration 566
  • Ecology 4.2k
Replace Parsons (United States) with:
Parsons (United States) United States
Virginia Cooperative Extension United States
United Nations Development Programme United States
ICF International (United States) United States
American Institute of Biological Sciences United States
University of Maryland Eastern Shore United States
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Canada
Government of Canada Canada
Manhattan University United States
VA Office of Research and Development United States
United States Department of Labor relative to Parsons (United States) United States Parsons (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Parsons (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Department of Labor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Department of Labor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Department of Labor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Department of Labor more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Department of Labor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Department of Labor at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Department of Labor at the time of their publication.

About United States Department of Labor

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Department of Labor have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 38.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 66 papers in Public Administration, 121 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 47 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 6 papers in Chemical Health and Safety and 36 papers in Forestry on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (76 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (64 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (62 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (59 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (56 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (52 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (42 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (40 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (2.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.0k citations), Forestry (677 citations), Public Administration (566 citations) and Ecology (4.2k citations). Authors at United States Department of Labor collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Journal of Chemistry, Animal Production Science, Marine and Freshwater Research, International Journal of Wildland Fire and Functional Plant Biology. Some of United States Department of Labor's most productive authors include James Kennedy, Timothy D. Colmer, Laurentius A. C. J. Voesenek, Jon E. Keeley, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, Jennifer Cohen, Xiao‐Ming Chen, Alexandra D. Syphard, Shao‐Liang Zheng and Lisa Schur.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact