United States Department of Labor
Impact in
- Occupational Therapy top 10%
- Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
-
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Healthcare Policy and Management
Papers in
-
- Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces 64
- Top scholars
- Peter F. InfanteBrent R. MoultonDante J. PiccianoMelissa Anne McDiarmidAnn Bonar BlalockJorge F. Pérez‐LópezStephen A. WandnerMichael Feuerstein
- Journals
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine (22 papers)Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (17 papers)Journal of Employment Counseling (12 papers)Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (11 papers)American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
United States Department of Labor
493 papers receiving 7.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Occupational Therapy 478
- Economics and Econometrics 1.4k
- Chemical Health and Safety 37
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 140
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 354
Countries citing scholars working at United States Department of Labor
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Department of Labor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Department of Labor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Department of Labor more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Department of Labor
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Department of Labor at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Department of Labor at the time of their publication.
About United States Department of Labor
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Department of Labor have published 527 papers, which have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 66 papers in Occupational Therapy, 73 papers in Safety Research, 115 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 13 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology on the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (68 papers), Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces (64 papers), Career Development and Diversity (37 papers), Disability Education and Employment (24 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (23 papers), Education Systems and Policy (21 papers), Industrial and Mining Safety (21 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Occupational Therapy (478 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.4k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (37 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (140 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (354 citations). Authors at United States Department of Labor collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Journal of Employment Counseling, Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene and American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. Some of United States Department of Labor's most productive authors include Peter F. Infante, Brent R. Moulton, Dante J. Picciano, Melissa Anne McDiarmid, Ann Bonar Blalock, Jorge F. Pérez‐López, Stephen A. Wandner, Michael Feuerstein, Thesia I. Garner and Clinton R. Shiells.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.