Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
-
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 63
- Plant and animal studies 18
- Top scholars
- Sarayudh BunyavejchewinPatrick J. BakerStuart James DaviesSomran SuddeePaul F. DonaldWinanda HimamanSaksit SimcharoenAchara Simcharoen
- Journals
- Phytotaxa (20 papers)Zootaxa (13 papers)Scientific Reports (13 papers)PLoS ONE (13 papers)Journal of Tropical Ecology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- ThailandUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation
584 papers receiving 9.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.4k
- Ecology 2k
- Ecological Modeling 214
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation at the time of their publication.
About Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation have published 640 papers, which have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 121 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 14 papers in Ecological Modeling, 54 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 116 papers in Ecology and 176 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (126 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (74 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (63 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (42 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (34 papers), Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (25 papers) and Plant and animal studies (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.4k citations), Ecology (2k citations), Ecological Modeling (214 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations). Authors at Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation collaborate with scholars in Thailand, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Zootaxa, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and Journal of Tropical Ecology. Some of Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation's most productive authors include Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Patrick J. Baker, Stuart James Davies, Somran Suddee, Paul F. Donald, Winanda Himaman, Saksit Simcharoen, Achara Simcharoen, Robert Steinmetz and James L. David Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.