Department of National Defence

18.6k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Department of National Defence

1.1k papers receiving 18.6k citations

Peers

Department of National Defence
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.4k
  • Pollution 536
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 178
Replace Wilkes University with:
Wilkes University United States
United States Coast Guard United States
ICF International (United States) United States
Federal Bureau of Investigation United States
Booz Allen Hamilton (United States) United States
Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail Canada
Pennsylvania Western University United States
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency United States
York College of Pennsylvania United States
North York General Hospital Canada
Department of National Defence relative to Wilkes University United States Wilkes University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Wilkes University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Department of National Defence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Department of National Defence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Department of National Defence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Department of National Defence more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Department of National Defence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Department of National Defence at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Department of National Defence at the time of their publication.

About Department of National Defence

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Department of National Defence have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 18.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 138 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 100 papers in Clinical Psychology, 28 papers in Occupational Therapy, 49 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 67 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (48 papers), Radar Systems and Signal Processing (34 papers), Education and Military Integration (30 papers), Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques (30 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (27 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (27 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (24 papers) and Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.4k citations), Pollution (536 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (178 citations). Authors at Department of National Defence collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Military Psychology, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Journal of Power Sources and Defence and Peace Economics. Some of Department of National Defence's most productive authors include Nezih Mrad, Wendy A. Darr, Usman Raja, Pierre Berini, T. Thayaparan, Jalal A.-A. Hawari, Guy Ampleman, Maxime A. Tremblay, Sonia Thiboutot and Mark A. Zamorski.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact