Walt Disney (United States)

61.8k citations
1.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Walt Disney (United States)

1.6k papers receiving 61.8k citations

Peers

Walt Disney (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 9.4k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 17.8k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 4.1k
  • Computational Mechanics 5.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4k
Replace Apple (United States) with:
Apple (United States) United States
International Computer Science Institute United States
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute United States
Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence United States
Naval Information Warfare Systems Command United States
Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific United States
Cisco Systems (United States) United States
VMware (United States)
NEC (United States) United States
Oracle (United States) United States
Walt Disney (United States) relative to Apple (United States) United States Apple (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Apple (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Walt Disney (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Walt Disney (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Walt Disney (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walt Disney (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Walt Disney (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Walt Disney (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Walt Disney (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Walt Disney (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Walt Disney (United States) have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 61.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 348 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 98 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 309 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 75 papers in Media Technology and 65 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (325 papers), Human Motion and Animation (94 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (88 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (77 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (62 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (56 papers), Robotic Locomotion and Control (56 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (52 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (9.4k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (17.8k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (4.1k citations), Computational Mechanics (5.8k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4k citations). Authors at Walt Disney (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, Zoo Biology, PLoS ONE and IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. Some of Walt Disney (United States)'s most productive authors include Markus H. Groß, Iain A. Matthews, Federico Perazzi, Patrick Lucey, Ivan Poupyrev, Leonid Sigal, Jeffrey F. Cohn, Alexander Sorkine‐Hornung, Ali Israr and Takeo Kanade A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact