Walt Disney (United States)

64.3k citations
2.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Walt Disney (United States)

1.8k papers receiving 62.3k citations

Peers

Walt Disney (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 8.0k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 26.1k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 7.0k
  • Developmental Biology 1.2k
  • Computational Mechanics 8.3k
Replace Meta (United States) with:
Meta (United States) United States
Mitsubishi Electric (United States) United States
Apple (United States) United States
Adobe Systems (United States) United States
Creative Technologies (United States) United States
UC San Diego Health System United States
International Computer Science Institute United States
UC Irvine Health United States
Yahoo (United States) United States
Nvidia (United States) United States
Walt Disney (United States) relative to Meta (United States) United States Meta (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Meta (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Walt Disney (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Walt Disney (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Walt Disney (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walt Disney (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Walt Disney (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Walt Disney (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Walt Disney (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Walt Disney (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Walt Disney (United States) have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 64.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 311 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 633 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 168 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 50 papers in Developmental Biology and 99 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (299 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (216 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (206 papers), Human Motion and Animation (164 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (116 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (104 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (78 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (75 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (8.0k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (26.1k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (7.0k citations), Developmental Biology (1.2k citations) and Computational Mechanics (8.3k citations). Authors at Walt Disney (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including ACM Transactions on Graphics, Zoo Biology, Computer Graphics Forum, The Medical Journal of Australia and PLoS ONE. Some of Walt Disney (United States)'s most productive authors include Iain Matthews, Markus Groß, Ivan Poupyrev, Patrick Lucey, Federico Perazzi, Jeffrey F. Cohn, Leonid Sigal, Alexander Sorkine‐Hornung, Ali Israr and Takeo Kanade.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact