Defence Equipment and Support

292 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Defence Equipment and Support
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Occupational Therapy 125
  • Computer Networks and Communications 776
  • Signal Processing 240
  • Information Systems 478
  • Control and Systems Engineering 400
Replace Digital Catapult with:
Digital Catapult United Kingdom
Teddington Memorial Hospital United Kingdom
KES International United Kingdom
Altran (France) France
Ordnance Survey United Kingdom
Association of Electronic and Information Technologies Spain
UK Research and Innovation United Kingdom
Derby College United Kingdom
MIRA (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Scottish Power (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Defence Equipment and Support relative to Digital Catapult United Kingdom Digital Catapult's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Digital Catapult · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Defence Equipment and Support

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Defence Equipment and Support. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Defence Equipment and Support with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Defence Equipment and Support more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Defence Equipment and Support

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Defence Equipment and Support at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Defence Equipment and Support at the time of their publication.

About Defence Equipment and Support

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Defence Equipment and Support have published 358 papers, which have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Occupational Therapy, 27 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 3 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology, 15 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 41 papers in Control and Systems Engineering on the topics of Occupational Health and Performance (17 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (16 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (14 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (11 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (10 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (9 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (9 papers) and Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Occupational Therapy (125 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (776 citations), Signal Processing (240 citations), Information Systems (478 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (400 citations). Authors at Defence Equipment and Support collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Slovenia and have published in prestigious journals including Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Journal of science and medicine in sport and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. Some of Defence Equipment and Support's most productive authors include Nitin Naik, Paul Jenkins, Eluned A. Lewis, Vaidhianathasamy Moorthy, Brian Andrew Shaw, Tom Jefferson, Mark Sumner, A. Douglas, P. F. Hopkins and Vittorio Demicheli.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact