Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research
Impact in
- Aquatic Science top 5%
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Aquatic life and conservation
-
- Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Papers in
- Aquatic Science 211
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies 117
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth 113
- Physiology 45
- Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species 45
- Top scholars
- M. S. AkhtarAlexander CijiBiju Sam KamalamStéphane PanseratFrançoise MédaleDebajit SarmaRaja Aadil Hussain BhatNeetu Shahi
- Journals
- Aquaculture (20 papers)Fish Physiology and Biochemistry (13 papers)Fish & Shellfish Immunology (9 papers)Journal of Thermal Biology (9 papers)Scientific Reports (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research
401 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Aquatic Science 2.7k
- Immunology 2.1k
- Physiology 446
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 635
- Ecology 942
Countries citing scholars working at Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research at the time of their publication.
About Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research have published 461 papers, which have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 211 papers in Aquatic Science, 45 papers in Physiology, 98 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 126 papers in Immunology and 19 papers in Microbiology on the topics of Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (123 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (117 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (113 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (87 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (45 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (36 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (32 papers) and Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aquatic Science (2.7k citations), Immunology (2.1k citations), Physiology (446 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (635 citations) and Ecology (942 citations). Authors at Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Aquaculture, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, Fish & Shellfish Immunology, Journal of Thermal Biology and Scientific Reports. Some of Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research's most productive authors include M. S. Akhtar, Alexander Ciji, Biju Sam Kamalam, Stéphane Panserat, Françoise Médale, Debajit Sarma, Raja Aadil Hussain Bhat, Neetu Shahi, Sumanta Kumar Mallik and Narottam Prasad Sahu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.