Center for Scientific Review

13.3k citations
438 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Center for Scientific Review

291 papers receiving 10.3k citations

Peers

Center for Scientific Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Physiology 1.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Biological Psychiatry 126
  • Social Psychology 1.2k
  • Health 407
Replace Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center with:
Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center United States
Heritage Foundation United States
Arthur M. Sackler Gallery United States
Washington School of Psychiatry United States
AARP United States
VA Healthcare-VISN 4 United States
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine United States
Guilford College United States
Clinical Research Associates United States
Monroe Community Hospital United States
Center for Scientific Review relative to Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center United States Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Center for Scientific Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Scientific Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Scientific Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Scientific Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Scientific Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Scientific Review at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Scientific Review at the time of their publication.

About Center for Scientific Review

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Scientific Review have published 438 papers, which have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11 papers in Health, 2 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 1 paper in Research and Theory, 38 papers in Epidemiology and 9 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty on the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (13 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (11 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (10 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physiology (1.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (126 citations), Social Psychology (1.2k citations) and Health (407 citations). Authors at Center for Scientific Review collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Amyloid, Academic Medicine, Nursing Research and PLoS ONE. Some of Center for Scientific Review's most productive authors include Jean D. Sipe, Alan S. Cohen, Stuart James, Dennis A. Revicki, Chiung M. Chen, Hsiao‐ye Yi, Rosalind A. Breslow, Thomas C. Harford, Aaron M. White and Stuart James.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact