Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Genetics top 10%
- Genetic diversity and population structure
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Papers in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 114
- Physiology 18
- Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species 18
- Top scholars
- Shawn R. NarumJon E. HessNathan R. CampbellAndrew P. MatalaMichael Ryan MillerPaul A. HohenloheC. Alex BuerkleJohn W. Davey
- Journals
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (35 papers)North American Journal of Fisheries Management (31 papers)Evolutionary Applications (22 papers)Molecular Ecology (20 papers)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
286 papers receiving 10.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.8k
- Genetics 5.1k
- Physiology 265
- Ecology 1.3k
- Aquatic Science 315
Countries citing scholars working at Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission at the time of their publication.
About Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission have published 297 papers, which have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 116 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 18 papers in Physiology, 121 papers in Genetics, 10 papers in Aquatic Science and 26 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (118 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (114 papers), Marine and fisheries research (22 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (18 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (15 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (11 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (11 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.8k citations), Genetics (5.1k citations), Physiology (265 citations), Ecology (1.3k citations) and Aquatic Science (315 citations). Authors at Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Evolutionary Applications, Molecular Ecology and Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Some of Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission's most productive authors include Shawn R. Narum, Jon E. Hess, Nathan R. Campbell, Andrew P. Matala, Michael Ryan Miller, Paul A. Hohenlohe, C. Alex Buerkle, John W. Davey, Ken Collis and Madison S. Powell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.