Critical Path Institute

443 papers receiving 14.9k citations

Peers

Critical Path Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Health Informatics 217
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 839
  • Infectious Diseases 1.4k
  • Pharmacology 603
Replace West Health with:
West Health United States
Phoenix College United States
Tucson Medical Center United States
HealthInsight United States
HonorHealth United States
Clinical Research Consortium United States
George E. Wahlen Department of VA Medical Center United States
University Physicians United States
IJ Research (United States) United States
Protein Metrics (United States) United States
Critical Path Institute relative to West Health United States West Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.3×
West Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Critical Path Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Critical Path Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Critical Path Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Path Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Critical Path Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Critical Path Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Critical Path Institute at the time of their publication.

About Critical Path Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Critical Path Institute have published 571 papers, which have received a total of 18.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Statistics and Probability, 12 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 8 papers in Transplantation, 4 papers in Health Informatics and 67 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (59 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (42 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (32 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (25 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (23 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (23 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (21 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Informatics (217 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (839 citations), Infectious Diseases (1.4k citations) and Pharmacology (603 citations). Authors at Critical Path Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Value in Health, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, Clinical and Translational Science and Alzheimer s & Dementia. Some of Critical Path Institute's most productive authors include Laurie W. Ford, Raymond L. Woosley, Eric R. Braverman, Jeffrey D. Ford, Klaus Romero, Lynn D. Hudson, Stephen Joel Coons, Richard A. Rudick, Nicholas G. LaRocca and Ralph H. B. Benedict.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact