Embrapa Cerrados

37.5k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
    • Soil Management and Crop Yield
    • Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Forestry top 5%

Papers in

    • Soil Management and Crop Yield 156
    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 143
    • Agricultural Science and Fertilization 85

Embrapa Cerrados

1.7k papers receiving 37.5k citations

Peers

Embrapa Cerrados
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Soil Science 9.7k
  • Forestry 1k
  • Insect Science 2.8k
  • Plant Science 9.9k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 2.5k
Replace Embrapa Rice and Beans with:
Embrapa Rice and Beans Brazil
Agronomical Institute of Campinas Brazil
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais Brazil
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo Brazil
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia Brazil
Instituto Agronômico do Paraná Brazil
Embrapa Meio Ambiente Brazil
Embrapa Agrobiology Brazil
Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios Brazil
Embrapa Soja Brazil
Embrapa Cerrados relative to Embrapa Rice and Beans Brazil Embrapa Rice and Beans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Embrapa Rice and Beans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Embrapa Cerrados

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Embrapa Cerrados. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Embrapa Cerrados with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embrapa Cerrados more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Embrapa Cerrados

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Embrapa Cerrados at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Embrapa Cerrados at the time of their publication.

About Embrapa Cerrados

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Embrapa Cerrados have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 419 papers in Soil Science, 66 papers in Forestry, 562 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Horticulture and 138 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Soil Management and Crop Yield (156 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (143 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (119 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (91 papers), Agricultural Science and Fertilization (85 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (82 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (80 papers) and Growth and nutrition in plants (65 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (9.7k citations), Forestry (1k citations), Insect Science (2.8k citations), Plant Science (9.9k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (2.5k citations). Authors at Embrapa Cerrados collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Scientia Agricola, Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. Some of Embrapa Cerrados's most productive authors include Marc Corbeels, Mariangela Hungría, Edson Eyji Sano, Ieda Carvalho Mendes, D. V. S. Resck, Alexandre Specht, M. A. T. Vargas, Charles Martins de Oliveira, José Felipe Ribeiro and Silvana Vieira de Paula-Moraes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact