National Research Council
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 35
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 29
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 26
- Astro and Planetary Science 23
- Top scholars
- C. L. BennettEdward J. WollackS. S. MeyerM. HalpernLyman A. PageG. HinshawE. L. WrightN. Jarosik
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (71 papers)Journal of Nursing Regulation (19 papers)Scientific Reports (17 papers)The Science of The Total Environment (14 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- RomaniaItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
National Research Council
1.5k papers receiving 47.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 13.9k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 8.0k
- Instrumentation 1.2k
- Research and Theory 160
- Global and Planetary Change 3.1k
Countries citing scholars working at National Research Council
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Research Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Research Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Research Council more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Research Council
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Research Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Research Council at the time of their publication.
About National Research Council
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Research Council have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 51.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6 papers in Research and Theory, 115 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 149 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 7 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 65 papers in Pollution on the topics of Marine and fisheries research (38 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (35 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (33 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (29 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (28 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (26 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (24 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (13.9k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (8.0k citations), Instrumentation (1.2k citations), Research and Theory (160 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (3.1k citations). Authors at National Research Council collaborate with scholars in Romania, Italy and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Journal of Nursing Regulation, Scientific Reports, The Science of The Total Environment and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. Some of National Research Council's most productive authors include C. L. Bennett, Edward J. Wollack, S. S. Meyer, M. Halpern, Lyman A. Page, G. Hinshaw, E. L. Wright, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut and M. Limon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.