Central Laser Facility
Impact in
-
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
- Biophysics top 2%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Papers in
-
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 709
- Biophysics 240
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research 165
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 74
- Top scholars
- Pavel MatousekMichael TowrieAnthony William ParkerStanley W. BotchwayNicholas StoneDavid NeelyPeter NorreysIan P. Clark
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (119 papers)Physics of Plasmas (94 papers)Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (79 papers)New Journal of Physics (46 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (46 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Central Laser Facility
1.9k papers receiving 66.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 21.8k
- Biophysics 7.1k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 6k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 14.2k
- Radiation 1.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Central Laser Facility
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Laser Facility. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Laser Facility with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Laser Facility more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Central Laser Facility
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Laser Facility at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Laser Facility at the time of their publication.
About Central Laser Facility
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Laser Facility have published 2k papers, which have received a total of 66.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 726 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 240 papers in Biophysics, 222 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 488 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 57 papers in Radiation on the topics of Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (709 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (273 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (212 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (165 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (132 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (74 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (70 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (46 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (21.8k citations), Biophysics (7.1k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (6k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (14.2k citations) and Radiation (1.5k citations). Authors at Central Laser Facility collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, Physics of Plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, New Journal of Physics and Journal of the American Chemical Society. Some of Central Laser Facility's most productive authors include Pavel Matousek, Michael Towrie, Anthony William Parker, Stanley W. Botchway, Nicholas Stone, David Neely, Peter Norreys, Ian P. Clark, A. J. Langley and Anthony Bell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.