Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute
Impact in
- Aquatic Science top 2%
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Aquatic life and conservation
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Papers in
- Aquatic Science 671
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies 502
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth 228
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 368
- Fish biology, ecology, and behavior 106
- Top scholars
- Basanta Kumar DasBijay Kumar BeheraRanjana SinhaVikash KumarUttam Kumar SarkarBimal Prasanna MohantySuvra RoyDharmendra Kumar Meena
- Journals
- Aquaculture (58 papers)Environmental Science and Pollution Research (43 papers)Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (27 papers)Hydrobiologia (18 papers)Scientific Reports (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute
1.3k papers receiving 19.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
- Aquatic Science 7.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.2k
- Immunology 4.5k
- Pollution 2.3k
- Physiology 707
Countries citing scholars working at Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 20.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 671 papers in Aquatic Science, 399 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 311 papers in Ecology, 234 papers in Immunology and 53 papers in Physiology on the topics of Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (502 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (368 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (228 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (218 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (106 papers), Marine and fisheries research (91 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (88 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity (87 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aquatic Science (7.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.2k citations), Immunology (4.5k citations), Pollution (2.3k citations) and Physiology (707 citations). Authors at Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Aquaculture, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Hydrobiologia and Scientific Reports. Some of Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute's most productive authors include Basanta Kumar Das, Bijay Kumar Behera, Ranjana Sinha, Vikash Kumar, Uttam Kumar Sarkar, Bimal Prasanna Mohanty, Suvra Roy, Dharmendra Kumar Meena, Srikanta Samanta and Ajoy Saha.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.