China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets
Impact in
- Finance top 10%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Stochastic processes and financial applications
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Accounting top 10%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
- Finance 195
- Stochastic processes and financial applications 86
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 63
- Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling 49
- Accounting 84
- Corporate Finance and Governance 54
China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets
404 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Finance 1.3k
- Accounting 1.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.8k
- Management Science and Operations Research 599
- Strategy and Management 695
Countries citing scholars working at China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets at the time of their publication.
About China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets
In recent decades, authors affiliated with China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets have published 513 papers, which have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 195 papers in Finance, 84 papers in Accounting, 159 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 75 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 43 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Stochastic processes and financial applications (86 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (63 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (54 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (49 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (43 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (32 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (27 papers) and Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Finance (1.3k citations), Accounting (1.1k citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.8k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (599 citations) and Strategy and Management (695 citations). Authors at China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Finance research letters, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal and Accounting and Finance. Some of China Institute of Finance and Capital Markets's most productive authors include Zhichuan Li, Wei‐Fong Pan, Xian‐Tao Zeng, Tiejun Tong, Dehui Luo, Haitao Chu, Lu Lin, Hong Weng, Jiandong Shi and Qihang Xue.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.