Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours
Impact in
-
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Papers in
-
- Nosocomial Infections in ICU 12
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 39
- Top scholars
- Bruno GiraudeauStéphan EhrmannAgnès CailleJie LiClémence LeyratJames B. FinkElsa TavernierJulie Léger
- Journals
- Annals of Intensive Care (15 papers)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (14 papers)Critical Care (14 papers)Intensive Care Medicine (13 papers)BMJ Open (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours
385 papers receiving 9.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Infectious Diseases 1.8k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 368
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.4k
- Statistics and Probability 520
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 222
Countries citing scholars working at Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours at the time of their publication.
About Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours have published 428 papers, which have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 22 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 45 papers in Statistics and Probability, 14 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 22 papers in Neurology and 47 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (39 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (28 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (13 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (12 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (12 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (1.8k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (368 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.4k citations), Statistics and Probability (520 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (222 citations). Authors at Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Intensive Care, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Critical Care, Intensive Care Medicine and BMJ Open. Some of Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours's most productive authors include Bruno Giraudeau, Stéphan Ehrmann, Agnès Caille, Jie Li, Clémence Leyrat, James B. Fink, Elsa Tavernier, Julie Léger, Brennan C Kahan and Laëtitia Bodet-Contentin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.